The First Step Toward Global Control
This post is interconnected to those dealing with most of the posts under our ‘Social Engineering’ page. I often tell people that, if you will bother to read what they write and have the courtesy to take them at their word, the people who really run the world will tell you what they want and how they intend to do it. I understand that much of the material involved is commonly associated with conspiracy theory. I also understand that this is by design; it serves the purposes of those who wish to remain in the shadows. Still, I am not making any claims to know who these people are, or exactly what they want or how they intend to do it. All I am doing here is presenting some of what they and others have said about their existence. What strikes me as most compelling about the quotes that follow is how far back they go; how internationally connected and consistent they are; and how – if we just look – we can and do find examples of what these people said they planned to do actually being put into policy and practice. So, with all this in mind, I present a little of what those we seek global control have said about the necessary first step in that direct is – and why it is central to achieving their goal.
Most of us know of the following men, so their words may not come as much of a surprise:
“Education is a regulation of the process of coming to share in the social consciousness; and that the adjustment of individual activity on the basis of this social consciousness is the only sure method of social reconstruction.”
It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of the nation, that the position of the individual is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole.
All our lives we fought against exalting the individual, against the elevation of the single person, and long ago we were over and done with the business of a hero, and here it comes up again: the glorification of one personality. This is not good at all.
Socialism is the phantastic younger brother of despotism, which it wants to inherit. Socialism wants to have the fullness of state force which before only existed in despotism. … However, it goes further than anything in the past because it aims at the formal destruction of the individual … who … can be used to improve communities by an expedient organ of government.
Unfortunately, while we may be aware of who they were, the majority of us probably think of these men and what they stood for as ‘ancient history.’ This is unfortunate because it is precisely this sort of ignorance that causes man to constantly repeat the same mistakes that have been made repeatedly throughout his history. These men may be dead, but their ideas and the goals for which they worked are alive and well. The proof is there: we just need to look for it and learn to recognize it for what it is. Consider what these old, dead guys said and compare their words to this next collection of quotes and see if you do not detect the same idea(s) underlining and connecting them to the ideas I just cited:
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.”
/* Style Definitions */
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
— Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization
“We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. . . Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. . . . We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electronic stimulation of the brain.”
–Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974.
“[There should be a] transformation of life in totality . . . [a] profound commitment to social tasks. . . . Achievement of socialist countries . . . have laid the foundation of a way of life which makes everyone understand its [sic] individual relevance.”
— Foundations of Lifelong Education, a UNESCO publication in 1976.
Notice that the same idea runs throughout all of these quotes. Then consider that these quotes represent just a sample of the whole body of argumentation out there that asserts society over the individual. This is the ‘Spirit’ of collectivism: the treating of all humanity as one organism which is then assumed to be self-governing, but in fact is controlled by self-appointed, ruling elite. The people who are arguing for this collectivist ideal naturally assume they will be among these ruling elite. I am convinced they also believe they are doing a good for humanity. But this is self-deception. The collective is an artificial creation. It does not exist. Nowhere in nature can we find a true collective. It is used here merely as a tool by which to justify the morally indefensible and to seduce the ignorant, greedy and lazy into going along with the plan. The collective is nothing more than a story sold to otherwise free people to convince them they should willingly enter into slavery where they will be cared for by the people selling them the story and at the expense of others. This is an ancient goal, pursued by an ancient means, and it fails every time. It fails because it violates Natural Law! It’s that simple.
[NOTE: To those who know and understand Scripture, this is another form of Satan’s attempt to treat the world as a single entity. Scripture is clear: we are individuals. This is why Scripture deals with salvation individually. Our relationship with God is individual, personal. But Stan seeks to treat all of humanity as one being. When he tempted Christ in the desert, Satan offered to deliver all of mankind to Christ – if Jesus would just worship Satan. This was the spirit of collectivism. We must be very, very careful to make sure we never mistake true and Biblically supported cooperation among willing individuals with the spirit of collectivism. They are not the same things.]