In the movie, The Matrix, there is a scene where the protagonist, Neo, is offered a choice. He could take a blue pill, in which case, he would fall asleep and wake up back in the fantasy world that had been created to control humanity. Or he could take the red pill, in which case, he would forever see things the way they truly are. The blue pill offered an easier life, while the red pill guaranteed struggle but also a chance for true freedom. This is the choice we all have to make. The world in which we live is not as it appears, and this is not conspiracy. The signs are there, you just need to know what you are looking for and where to look for them. This fantasy world is especially true of our political and economic systems. None of it is what it appears to be, and I believe the majority of Americans know it. They sense things are not right, but they also cling to the illusion because they can’t find the courage to face what lies behind the curtain. I chose the red pill, and while I may not be seeing it all in perfect clarity, I now see things closer to the way they are. Now I am offering you the chance to see behind the curtain as well. If you want to remain ignorant and happy, take the blue pill and do not read this post. But if you want to know more of the truth, take the red pill and keep reading.
What I am about to show you is only a part of the picture. There isn’t enough space in a single blog post to show you the whole picture. The best I can do is show you a part of it, and even then, all I can really show you are the threads that make up the picture. Think of these threads like the threads of a tapestry. A single thread in a tapestry is nothing. Several threads aren’t even much. But when you start to see many threads and how they are all connected to the others, that is when you start to see the big picture. So it is with the picture I am trying to help you see. You have to look at the threads I show you and pay attention to all the connections between them. The more threads and connections you become aware of, the clearer the picture will become.
This part of the picture starts with a man named Carroll Quigley. Carroll Quigley wrote a book few people have bothered to read, and many who have read it have dismissed it as fantasy and conspiracy theory. The book is titled “Tragedy and Hope,” and it is a mistake to dismiss it. Quigley wrote about the power brokers who run the world from behind the scenes. He was a lot like other men who have done the same thing: he was sympathetic to these power brokers. None of these men wrote to warn the world about what was coming so people could stop it; they wrote to tell people what was going to happen so they could get used to it, so they would accept it. These other men include George Orwell, who wrote “1984;” and Aldous Huxley, who wrote “Brave New World;” and even H.G. Wells. All of these men and the books they wrote are threads in the tapestry, and they are all connected. But before I can show you the connection, you need to read something Quigley wrote:
“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.” (Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, p. 950. 1964.)
Now, ‘Anglophile’ means English, as in the country of England. This may not mean a lot unless you understand that this Anglophile network he is talking about is largely made up of Fabian Socialists. This is how Quigley, Orwell, Huxley and Wells are all connected: through the Fabian Socialists. The Fabians are an entirely different part of the picture, and you should look into them – especially after reading the rest of this post – but we have to leave them for now. Just don’t forget them, they are very important.
The next part of the picture you need to understand requires you to read something else Quigley told the world:
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.” (, Tragedy and Hope, p. 324. 1966.)
This system of financial controls is manifested in America as the Federal Reserve, and globally as the International Monetary Fund, among other similar financial organizations that operate outside the reach of national governments.
Now, what happened after the World Wars is that these people realized war on that scale threatened the stability of the control structure they were trying to build. So they decided to interconnect the economies of the world. The idea is similar to the MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) deterrent policy we used during the Cold War. By making every nation’s economy dependent upon every other nation, these power brokers thought they could control all nations. If one tried to break from the ‘New World Order’ they were building, it would assure that nation’s economic ruin (part 2 and part 3). Remember, all of the things I have been telling you are threads in the big picture.
OK, so these people work behind the scenes. They have created independent financial systems to control national governments and linked national economies on a global scale as a means of holding the economy of any nation that thought about trying to break from the system that is being built hostage. So, where are the signs of this interconnection? Well, they are all around us. Look at how the U.S. continues to loan money to nations who are not friendly to America and who can do nothing in return. If you study it, you will find that the price of gold is being artificially manipulated, but so are the interest rates around the world. If you pay attention to the news, you might have noticed that many banks are starting to limit how much money customers can withdraw at a time. This is because the banks know that hyper-inflation is coming on a global scale and they are getting ready for runs on the banks. The control of oil and other forms of energy is also a sign of this international control. The plain truth is, once you accept that this system of control is real and in operation, then many of the things you read about and see in the news start to make more sense. That is because they are all connected. They are more threads in the tapestry.
Now for the political side of things. The people building this New World Order don’t want instability within a Nation’s government any more than they want it between nations, so they had to find a way to control the people – especially in the Western democracies. Once again, Quigley gives us some insight into how this was and is being done:
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy” (Tragedy and Hope, 1966.)
This is exactly what has happened. The two Parties, Democrat and Republican, are working together. That is why a Democrat and a Republican can tear each other apart on the floor of the House or Senate and be seen acting like best friends later than night while eating dinner together. It is because they are friends. They are just actors playing their role. This explains why your Party – no matter which one it is – always seems to be ‘giving in’ to the other Party. You see, what you thought you were sending them to do does not matter to them. They are all there for their own agenda. This is why the Bill Clinton was not convicted when he was impeached; it is why Obamacare has not been recalled; it is why Obama is still in Iraq and Afghanistan and why Obama has not been impeached. Neither Party can’t do anything about the other without hurting the central direction their masters want the nation to take. And if you doubt there is a central direction, do some research into government policy since the time of Woodrow Wilson. You will find very little real deviancy. Now think about this for a moment: if the Democrats were as far Left as they pretend to be, and the Republicans as far Right, wouldn’t you expect to find real swings in policy during those times when either Party held the House, Senate and White House? The answer is yes, you would – but you don’t! What you find is that both Parties follow the same general policy and pretend to be different for the benefit of keeping the voters under control.
Here is another way to know that the two Parties are really just one Party pretending to be two. When the TEA Party came on the scene in 2010, nearly 37% of its membership was comprised of people who did not identify themselves as ‘Republican,’ yet both Parties attacked the TEA Party. This is because the TEA Party was a true threat to the One-Party-as-Two system. It represented a real possibility that the system could be disrupted and, thus, they all went to work to destroy and/or co-opt the movement. By in large, they have succeeded. This is because they took over our schools, or entertainment media and our schools a long time ago. Now they use them to form, shape and direct public opinion, and they are very good at it – because they have turned it into a ‘science.’
This is another important piece of this picture: the people building this New World Order believe they are using ‘science’ to do it. This is why they no longer revert to brute force to control the people. Instead, they have decided it is easier to trick you into doing what they want you to do and to make you think it was your idea at the same time:
“One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order.” K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
“We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood.” Carl R. Rodgers, Former President of the American Psychological Association (APA)
“We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. . . Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. . . . We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electronic stimulation of the brain.” Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry at Yale University Medical School, Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118, Feb. 24, 1974. Delgado was reported as part of the “MK-Ultra” CIA mind-control program.
“Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished … The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are ‘obstructive’ and verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective … It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.” Bertrand Russell quoting Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810
These are all calls to control people coming from various fields of ‘science’ since at least 1810. Remember, Quigley told us these people have been at this for many, many years. These quotes affirm what he told us. (for a truly frightening read on what ‘science’ has had to say about you and I, read this link).
Now for some more fun connecting threads: did you know that President Bill Clinton is directly connected to Caroll Quigley?
It should be no surprise to anyone, of course, that during his tenure as a professor at Georgetown in the 1960s, Quigley became the mentor to a young man with big political ambitions of his own. His name was Bill Clinton.
So, now that you know the connection between Quigley and Clinton, does this picture bother you any – especially considering their apparent ages at the time it was taken?
Hopefully you are starting to see that things are not what we have been lead to believe they are – because they aren’t. Remember, this post only shows you some of the connections between the people controlling our world and Carrol Quigley. Maybe next time I will show you the connections between those same people and Saul Alinksy. Then I could show you the inter-connections between that group of people and how they can be traced to Hitler, Mussolini, FDR, Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt. That would really give you a nice size chunk of the bigger picture, but only if you choose to see it.